Minor v. State
This text of 48 S.E. 198 (Minor v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. In the trial of a criminal case in which the accused fails to make a statement, it is improper and calculated to injure the accused for the State’s counsel to say to the jury in his argument: “ There sits the man accused of this dreadful crime, and don’t even come on the stand to deny it, though his constitutional right allows him to make his statement and deny his guilt.” Bird v. State, 50 Ga. 585; Robinson v. State, 82 Ga. 535; O'Dell v. State, 120 Ga. 152. Counsel for the accused having objected to the remark and moved for a mistrial, it was error to refuse the motion, unless the court, by appropriate instructions, obviated any injurious effect to the accused from the remarks made. The withdrawal of the remarks by the State’s counsel and the court’s admonishing him to confine himself to the evidence were not sufficient to remove the effect of the improper argument.
2. It is error to charge, without qualification, that “positive evidence is stronger than negative.” Southern Ry. Co. v. O'Bryan, 115 Ga. 669.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 S.E. 198, 120 Ga. 490, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minor-v-state-ga-1904.