Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Bedsole v. State

Bedsole v. State

124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 792, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 669
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 9, 1924
Docket15720
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 S.E. 812 (Bedsole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bedsole v. State, 124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 792, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. The 3d special ground of the motion for a new trial alleges error because of improper remarks of the solicitor-[793]*793general in his argument to the jury; and counsel for plaintiff in error, in support of this ground, cites the cases of Minor v. State, 120 Ga. 490 (48 S. E. 189), and Cæsar v. State, 125 Ga. 6 (53 S. E. 815). The case under consideration differs from the cases cited, in that the evidence in this ease absolutely demanded the verdict returned; and therefore the improper argument of the solicitor-general could not and did not injure the defendant’s cause. See Hagar v. State, 71 Ga. 167, and citations.

■ 2. The other grounds of the motion are without merit, and the judgment is

Affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. State
48 S.E.2d 565 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Baggett v. State
47 S.E.2d 769 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Rogers v. State
137 S.E. 576 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1927)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 S.E. 812, 32 Ga. App. 792, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bedsole-v-state-gactapp-1924.