Caesar v. State
53 S.E. 815, 125 Ga. 6, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 9
Opinion
This case, upon its facts, is controlled by the decision of this court in Minor v. State, 120 Ga. 490; and a new trial is ordered solely because of the improper argument of counsel for the State touching the failure of the accused to avail himself of his privilege of making a statement to the jury in his own behalf.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caesar v. State, 53 S.E. 815, 125 Ga. 6, 1906 Ga. LEXIS 9 (Ga. 1906).
53 S.E. 815 (Caesar v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elliott v. State
824 S.E.2d 265 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2019)
Parks v. State
67 S.E.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Thornton v. State
10 S.E.2d 746 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Barker v. State
56 S.E. 419 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1907)