Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.

419 U.S. 802
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 1974·No. A-232; A-262·Published·Cited by 20 cases

Opinions

Respective applications for an order vacating or modifying stay order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Blackmun, and by him referred to the Court, are both denied. Four Justices, however, state explicitly that these denials are without prejudice to applicants’ renewal of their applications to vacate if the litigation has not been finally decided by the Court of Appeals by January 31, 1975. Reported below: 498 F. 2d 1073.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al., 419 U.S. 802 (1974).

419 U.S. 802 (Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.
682 F. Supp. 446 (E.D. Missouri, 1988)
United States v. Barth
591 F. Supp. 91 (D. Connecticut, 1984)
First Amendment Coalition v. Judicial Inquiry & Review Board
584 F. Supp. 635 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1984)
Chevron Chemical Co. v. Costle
499 F. Supp. 745 (D. Delaware, 1980)
Orange County v. Department of Transportation
265 S.E.2d 890 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1980)
Davis v. Reagan
485 F. Supp. 1255 (S.D. Iowa, 1980)
Rennie v. Klein
481 F. Supp. 552 (D. New Jersey, 1979)
Marshall v. NOLICHUCKY SAND CO., INC.
490 F. Supp. 1041 (E.D. Tennessee, 1979)
Evans v. Buchanan
455 F. Supp. 705 (D. Delaware, 1978)
Reserve Mining Co. v. Herbst
256 N.W.2d 808 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1977)
United States v. Reserve Mining Company
543 F.2d 1210 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)
United States v. Reserve Mining Co.
543 F.2d 1210 (Eighth Circuit, 1976)