Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.
This text of 419 U.S. 802 (Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Respective applications for an order vacating or modifying stay order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Blackmun, and by him referred to the Court, are both denied. Four Justices, however, state explicitly that these denials are without prejudice to applicants’ renewal of their applications to vacate if the litigation has not been finally decided by the Court of Appeals by January 31, 1975. Reported below: 498 F. 2d 1073.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
419 U.S. 802, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minnesota-et-al-v-reserve-mining-co-et-al-and-united-states-v-reserve-scotus-1974.