Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.
Opinions
Respective applications for an order vacating or modifying stay order of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, presented to Mr. Justice Blackmun, and by him referred to the Court, are both denied. Four Justices, however, state explicitly that these denials are without prejudice to applicants’ renewal of their applications to vacate if the litigation has not been finally decided by the Court of Appeals by January 31, 1975. Reported below: 498 F. 2d 1073.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
419 U.S. 802 (Minnesota Et Al. v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.; And United States v. Reserve Mining Co. Et Al.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.