Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.

62 S.E. 716, 5 Ga. App. 154, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 41
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 10, 1908·No. 1277·Published·Cited by 17 cases

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Corporate name connotes corporate entity. This is applicable to both civil and criminal cases. Van Winkle Gin Works v. Mathews, 2 Ga. App. 249 (58 S. E. 396); Ager v. State, 2 Ga. App. 158 (58 S. E. 374) ; Foley & Williams Mfg. Co. v. Bell, 4 Ga. App. 448 ( 61 S. E. 856); Charles v. Valdosta Foundry Co., 4 Ga. App. 733 (62 S. E. 493).

2. An action may be properly instituted by employing the initials instead of the full Christian name of the defendant. “In this State men are commonly known by the initials of their Christian names as well as they are by those names in full.” Any common-law rule of practice to the contrary does not exist in this State, because of lack of suitableness to our conditions. Eaves v. State, 113 Ga. 755 (39 S. E. 318) ; Minor v. State, 63 Ga. 318; Turner v. Thompson, 58 Ga. 271 (36 Am. R. 297).

3. The order of the examination of witnesses and the allowance of leading questions are matters so largely in the discretion of the trial judge as to warrant no interference, except in eases of manifest abuse. There was no abuse of discretion in the present ease.

4. The question of the value of an article is peculiarly for the jury, and that body is not absolutely bound by the opinions or estimates of the witness on that subject. Morris Storage Co. v. Wilkes, 1 Ga. App. 752 (58 S. E. 232); Atlantia Coast Line R. Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 667 (57 S. E. 1030). Judgment affirmed.

Trover, from city court of Brunswick — Judge Krauss. June 19, 1908. Argued October 28, Decided November 10, 1908. Francis H. Harris, for plaintiff in error. Bennet <& Conyers, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co., 62 S.E. 716, 5 Ga. App. 154, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 41 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

62 S.E. 716 (Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hawkins v. Turner
303 S.E.2d 164 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)
Williams v. Appliances, Inc.
86 S.E.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1955)
Luckie v. Max Wright, Inc.
82 S.E.2d 660 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
Sapp v. Howe
52 S.E.2d 571 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1949)
Cowart v. McDaris
24 S.E.2d 68 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Hansberger Motor Transportation Co. v. Pate
181 S.E. 796 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Swain v. Georgia Power & Light Co.
169 S.E. 249 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Georgia Power Co. v. Chapman
168 S.E. 131 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Lee v. Brandenburg
122 S.E. 247 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1924)
Widincamp v. McCall
104 S.E. 642 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1920)
Westberry v. Hand
91 S.E. 930 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Johnson v. Stevens
91 S.E. 220 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)
Haverty Furniture Co. v. Calhoun
84 S.E. 138 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Great American Co-Operative Fire Ass'n v. Jenkins
76 S.E. 159 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
McNamara v. Georgia Cotton Co.
73 S.E. 1092 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)
Martin v. Martin
68 S.E. 1095 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)