Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.
This text of 62 S.E. 716 (Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Corporate name connotes corporate entity. This is applicable to both civil and criminal cases. Van Winkle Gin Works v. Mathews, 2 Ga. App. 249 (58 S. E. 396); Ager v. State, 2 Ga. App. 158 (58 S. E. 374) ; Foley & Williams Mfg. Co. v. Bell, 4 Ga. App. 448 ( 61 S. E. 856); Charles v. Valdosta Foundry Co., 4 Ga. App. 733 (62 S. E. 493).
2. An action may be properly instituted by employing the initials instead of the full Christian name of the defendant. “In this State men are commonly known by the initials of their Christian names as well as they are by those names in full.” Any common-law rule of practice to the contrary does not exist in this State, because of lack of suitableness to our conditions. Eaves v. State, 113 Ga. 755 (39 S. E. 318) ; Minor v. State, 63 Ga. 318; Turner v. Thompson, 58 Ga. 271 (36 Am. R. 297).
3. The order of the examination of witnesses and the allowance of leading questions are matters so largely in the discretion of the trial judge as to warrant no interference, except in eases of manifest abuse. There was no abuse of discretion in the present ease.
4. The question of the value of an article is peculiarly for the jury, and that body is not absolutely bound by the opinions or estimates of the witness on that subject. Morris Storage Co. v. Wilkes, 1 Ga. App. 752 (58 S. E. 232); Atlantia Coast Line R. Co. v. Harris, 1 Ga. App. 667 (57 S. E. 1030). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 S.E. 716, 5 Ga. App. 154, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 41, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/minchew-v-nahunta-lumber-co-gactapp-1908.