Martin v. Martin
This text of 68 S.E. 1095 (Martin v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. On the trial of an issue involving the value in bulk of a stock of merchandise and books of account and ehoses in action, the opinions of witnesses as to value of the property were not conclusive upon the jury. Bonds v. Brown, 133 Ga. 451 (66 S. E. 156) ; Jennings v. Stripling, 127 Ga. 778 (3), (56 S. E. 1026), and cit.; Minchew v. Nahunta Lumber Co., 5 Ga. App. 154 (62 S. E. 716).
2. Under the evidence in this ease it could not be said that the only verdict that could have been rendered was one for the plaintiff for the particular amount found in his favor.
3. This being the first grant of a new trial, the' discretion of - the trial judge in granting it will not be disturbed. Williams v. Brogdon, 133 Ga. 691 (66 S. E. 788).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 S.E. 1095, 135 Ga. 162, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/martin-v-martin-ga-1910.