Williams v. Brogdon

66 S.E. 788, 133 Ga. 691, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 310
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided December 24, 1909·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rise, O. J.

The verdict was not demanded by the evidence, and therefore the ease falls within the well-settled rule, now embodied in the Civil Code, §5585, that “The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and the facts require the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.”

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Williams v. Brogdon, 66 S.E. 788, 133 Ga. 691, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 310 (Ga. 1909).

66 S.E. 788 (Williams v. Brogdon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New v. Southern Railway Co.
71 S.E. 1104 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Martin v. Martin
68 S.E. 1095 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1910)