Mims v. State
84 So. 394, 17 Ala. App. 276, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250
Opinion
The affidavit was made before the probate judge, and warrant was issued and made returnable to the county court. There was no judgment in the county court, no appeal bond, no demand for a jury; in fact, nothing appears in the record to give the circuit court jurisdiction. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mims v. State, 84 So. 394, 17 Ala. App. 276, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).
84 So. 394 (Mims v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Parrish v. State
129 So. 312 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1930)
Upshaw v. State
96 So. 376 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Hall v. State
95 So. 904 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Courson v. State
93 So. 223 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)