Mims v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Mims v. State

84 So. 394, 17 Ala. App. 276, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 16, 1919

Docket5 Div. 302.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 84 So. 394 (Mims v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mims v. State, 84 So. 394, 17 Ala. App. 276, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The affidavit was made before the probate judge, and warrant was issued and made returnable to the county court. There was no judgment in the county court, no appeal bond, no demand for a jury; in fact, nothing appears in the record to give the circuit court jurisdiction. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The affidavit was made before the probate judge, and warrant was issued and made returnable to the county court. There was no judgment in the county court, no appeal bond, no demand for a jury; in fact, nothing appears in the record to give the circuit court jurisdiction. For this reason the judgment must be reversed. Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 So. 394, 17 Ala. App. 276, 1919 Ala. App. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mims-v-state-alactapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack