Upshaw v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Upshaw v. State

96 So. 376, 19 Ala. App. 227, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 100

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1923

Docket5 Div. 397.

StatusPublished

This text of 96 So. 376 (Upshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Upshaw v. State, 96 So. 376, 19 Ala. App. 227, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 100 (Ala. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

POSTER, J.

The appeal in this case is on the record without hill of exceptions. The recqrd shows that the appellant, defendant in the court below, was tried up ¡on an affidavit and warrant that issued out of the county court of Russell county. On November 24, 1922, this court upon motion of the state awarded a writ of cer-tiorari directing the clerk of the circuit court of Russell county to certify to this court a full and' complete copy of the judgment in the county court, also transcript in county court as required, by section 6726 of the Code, also appeal bond to the circuit court. On December 8, 1922, the clerk of the circuit court in response to the mandate of the writ of certiorari certified that the judgment of the county court, the appeal bond, and the transcript of proceedings in this cause from the county court were not on file and had never been on file in his office. Without the issuance of an alias writ of certiorari the clerk certified to this court on January 20, 1923, a copy of an appeal bond to the circuit court made by defendant in this cause, and that said bond was then in his possession and was in his possession a,t the time of the trial of said case in the circuit court, and that said case was docketed by him on" the circuit court trial docket after the appeal was taken. The motion to strike' from the record this return of the clerk made on January 20, 1923, is granted on the authority of Charlie Hall v. State, ante, p. 178, 95 South. 904.

The record shows no judgment in the county court, and there is nothing to support the judgment of conviction in the circuit court. The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded. Courson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 538, 93 South. 223; Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325; Jacobs v. State, 17 Ala. App. 396, 85 South. 837; Mitas v. State, 17 Ala. App. 276, 84 South. 394; Guin v. State, 17 Ala. App. 293, 84 South. 863.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

POSTER, J.

The appeal in this case is on the record without hill of exceptions. The recqrd shows that the appellant, defendant in the court below, was tried up ¡on an affidavit and warrant that issued out of the county court of Russell county. On November 24, 1922, this court upon motion of the state awarded a writ of cer-tiorari directing the clerk of the circuit court of Russell county to certify to this court a full and' complete copy of the judgment in the county court, also transcript in county court as required, by section 6726 of the Code, also appeal bond to the circuit court. On December 8, 1922, the clerk of the circuit court in response to the mandate of the writ of certiorari certified that the judgment of the county court, the appeal bond, and the transcript of proceedings in this cause from the county court were not on file and had never been on file in his office. Without the issuance of an alias writ of certiorari the clerk certified to this court on January 20, 1923, a copy of an appeal bond to the circuit court made by defendant in this cause, and that said bond was then in his possession and was in his possession a,t the time of the trial of said case in the circuit court, and that said case was docketed by him on" the circuit court trial docket after the appeal was taken. The motion to strike' from the record this return of the clerk made on January 20, 1923, is granted on the authority of Charlie Hall v. State, ante, p. 178, 95 South. 904.

The record shows no judgment in the county court, and there is nothing to support the judgment of conviction in the circuit court. The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded. Courson v. State, 18 Ala. App. 538, 93 South. 223; Haynes v. State, 5 Ala. App. 167, 59 South. 325; Jacobs v. State, 17 Ala. App. 396, 85 South. 837; Mitas v. State, 17 Ala. App. 276, 84 South. 394; Guin v. State, 17 Ala. App. 293, 84 South. 863.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

96 So. 376, 19 Ala. App. 227, 1923 Ala. App. LEXIS 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/upshaw-v-state-alactapp-1923.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack