Parrish v. State

129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 552, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 160
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 17, 1930·No. 8 Div. 896.·Published

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

There is nothing in this record to show jurisdiction of this case in the circuit court of Colbert county, and for that reason, if for no other, the judgment must be reversed. May v. State, 22 Ala. App. 515, 117 So. 499; Willis v. State; 22 Ala. App. 478, 117 So. 2; Holliday v. State, 22 Ala. App. 267, 114 So. 674; Miller v. State, 20 Ala. App. 625, 104 So. 775; Hall v. State, 19 Ala. App. 178, 95 So. 904; Mims v. State, 17 Ala. App. 276, 84 So. 394; Guin v. State, 17 Ala. Apjp. 293, 84 So. 863; Peebles v. State, 17 Ala. App. 430, 84 So. 859; Latikos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 655, 88 So. 47.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Parrish v. State, 129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 552, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 160 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

129 So. 312 (Parrish v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Latikos v. State
88 So. 47 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1921)
Hall v. State
95 So. 904 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1923)
Miller v. State
104 So. 775 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Mims v. State
84 So. 394 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)
Guin v. State
84 So. 863 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1919)
May v. State
117 So. 499 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1928)
Holliday v. State
114 So. 674 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1927)