Miller v. State
46 S.E. 838, 119 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 279
Opinion
The evidence fully authorized the verdict. All applications for new trials upon the ground of newly discovered evidence are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the trial judge; and even if-the newly discovered evidence relied on as a ground for a new trial was not cumulative in its nature, there is nothing in the record to indicate that the judge abused the discretion vested in him in overruling the motion on this ground.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 46 S.E. 838, 119 Ga. 561, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 279 (Ga. 1904).
46 S.E. 838 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kitchens v. State
187 S.E.2d 268 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1972)
Parks v. State
48 S.E.2d 837 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
MoCoy v. State
191 Ga. 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
McCoy v. State
13 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Brannon v. State
9 S.E.2d 152 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Taylor v. State
4 S.E.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Aycock v. State
4 S.E.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Jackson v. State
192 S.E. 454 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Terry v. State
175 S.E. 403 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)
Lakes v. Lakes
156 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Tyre v. State
143 S.E. 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Lawhorn v. State
116 S.E. 822 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Fountain v. State
107 S.E. 360 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Brown v. State
82 S.E. 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)
Hall v. State
80 S.E. 307 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1913)
Bradford v. Brand
64 S.E. 688 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1909)