Bradford v. Brand

64 S.E. 688, 132 Ga. 642, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 377
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 64 S.E. 688 (Bradford v. Brand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bradford v. Brand, 64 S.E. 688, 132 Ga. 642, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 377 (Ga. 1909).

Opinion

Holden, J.

1. All applications for new trials upon the ground of newly discovered evidence are addressed to the sound legal discretion of the trial judge; and even if the newly discovered evidence relied ón as a ground for' a new trial 'was not cumulative in its nature) there is nothing in the record to indicate that the judge abused the;,discretion vested in him in overruling the motion on this ground. Miller v. State, 119 Ga. 561 (46 S. E. 838).

2. The court did not err in admitting in' evidence the deeds to the admission of which the plaintiff objected; nor was there • any error of harmful effect to the plaintiff in the failure of the court to refer to such deeds in his charge.

3. The evidence was' amply sufficient to support the verdict, and the court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parks v. State
48 S.E.2d 837 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1948)
MoCoy v. State
191 Ga. 516 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
McCoy v. State
13 S.E.2d 183 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Taylor v. State
4 S.E.2d 484 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Aycock v. State
4 S.E.2d 221 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Jackson v. State
192 S.E. 454 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1937)
Lakes v. Lakes
156 S.E. 620 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1931)
Rowland v. State
145 S.E. 100 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Kingston v. State
145 S.E. 468 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Tyre v. State
143 S.E. 778 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Fountain v. State
107 S.E. 360 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)
Crumley v. State
98 S.E. 230 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Brown v. State
82 S.E. 238 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 S.E. 688, 132 Ga. 642, 1909 Ga. LEXIS 377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bradford-v-brand-ga-1909.