Fountain v. State

106 S.E. 814, 26 Ga. App. 609, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 552
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1921
Docket12090
StatusPublished

This text of 106 S.E. 814 (Fountain v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fountain v. State, 106 S.E. 814, 26 Ga. App. 609, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The only question raised in this case is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence was in conflict, hut we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the verdict, since if the jury believed the evidence for the State — which they did — a verdict of guilty was authorized; and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, this court can not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 S.E. 814, 26 Ga. App. 609, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fountain-v-state-gactapp-1921.