Fountain v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Fountain v. State

106 S.E. 814, 26 Ga. App. 609, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 552

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fountain v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 23 Ga. App. 113 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1921·No. 12090·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The only question raised in this case is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence was in conflict, hut we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the verdict, since if the jury believed the evidence for the State — which they did — a verdict of guilty was authorized; and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, this court can not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

The only question raised in this case is as to the sufficiency of the evidence. The evidence was in conflict, hut we cannot say that there was no evidence to support the verdict, since if the jury believed the evidence for the State — which they did — a verdict of guilty was authorized; and, the trial judge having approved the verdict, this court can not set it aside.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Fountain v. State, 106 S.E. 814, 26 Ga. App. 609, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 552 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

106 S.E. 814 (Fountain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.