Fountain v. State

98 S.E. 183, 23 Ga. App. 123, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 74
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 23, 1918·No. 1001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Bp.oylíís, P. J.

The only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions in this case is upon the refusal of the trial jud'ge to grant an application [124]*124for bail, made by a defendant who had been convicted' of voluntary manslaughter, and who had pending in this court a bill of exceptions to a judgment overruling his motion for a new trial. This’ court having this day affirmed the judgment of the lower court refusing a new trial . in that case \Fountain v. State, ante, 113), the question raised in the present ease became moot.

Decided November 23, 1918. Application for bail; from Ben Hill superior court—Judge Crum. July 27, 1918. John W. Bennett, H. J. Quincey, for plaintiff in error. J. B. Wall, solicitor-general, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

Bloodworth, J., concurs. Stephens, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fountain v. State, 98 S.E. 183, 23 Ga. App. 123, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 74 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

98 S.E. 183 (Fountain v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Horton v. State
158 S.E. 629 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)
Cumby v. State
158 S.E. 773 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1931)