Miller v. State
10 So. 3d 693, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5768, 2009 WL 1377831
Opinion
Willie Lee Miller appeals the revocation of his probation arguing that the State produced only hearsay evidence to support the alleged violation of the conditions of probation. The State rightly concedes that revocation in this case was improper given reliance on hearsay exclusively. See Andrews v. State, 693 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997).
Accordingly, the order revoking probation is VACATED, and the cause is REMANDED for the reinstatement of probation with appropriate credit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 10 So. 3d 693, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 5768, 2009 WL 1377831 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).
10 So. 3d 693 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Miller v. State
79 So. 3d 209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)