Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Miller v. State

Miller v. State

936 So. 2d 729, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714, 2006 WL 2366401
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 865 So. 2d 584 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 17, 2006·No. Nos. 1D05-0798, 1D05-0883·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the orders revoking Appellant’s concurrent terms of probation. The curfew and weekly reporting requirement were imposed as conditions of release following Appellant’s arrest for alleged probation violations that were subsequently dismissed. Because the curfew and weekly reporting requirement were not conditions of probation, the violation of those conditions may not serve as a basis for probation revocation. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for reinstatement of the concurrent terms of probation.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

DAVIS, POLSTON, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 936 So. 2d 729, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13714, 2006 WL 2366401 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

936 So. 2d 729 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.