Miller v. State
866 So. 2d 213, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2143, 2004 WL 360657
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 2004·No. No. 3D03-1230·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We have for review the denial by the trial court of Appellant’s Rule 3.850 Motion for Post Conviction Relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. The trial court denied Miller’s motion after an evi-dentiary hearing at which Appellant was afforded a full and fair opportunity to present evidence on his behalf and cross-examine his trial counsel. We find that the decision of the trial court to deny the motion was supported by competent substantial evidence. Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250 (Fla.1997).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. State, 866 So. 2d 213, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 2143, 2004 WL 360657 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
866 So. 2d 213 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scott v. State
866 So. 2d 213 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)