Miller v. State

941 So. 2d 471, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18322, 2006 WL 3077641
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 865 So. 2d 584
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 1, 2006·No. No. 4D06-3627·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The denial of appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct an illegal sentence filed in case numbers 80-01782 and 93-05219 is affirmed without prejudice. Appellant may file a rule 3.800(a) motion in case number 91-22625 if there is a scoresheet error that is apparent from the face of the record and if the life sentence could not have been imposed absent the alleged scoresheet error. See Brooks v. State, 930 So.2d 835 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

STEVENSON, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 941 So. 2d 471, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18322, 2006 WL 3077641 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 471 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. State
930 So. 2d 835 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)