Miller v. State

424 So. 2d 207, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18447
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 403 So. 2d 1017
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 5, 1983·No. No. 82-196·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of probation, judgment and sentence imposed herein. The record, however, establishes that the lower court failed to state with particularity its justification for retaining jurisdiction over one-third of the sentence. We remand to the lower court with directions to either relinquish the retention of jurisdiction over one-third of Miller’s sentence or to state with particularity the justification for retaining jurisdiction as required by section 947.16(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1981). Hernandez v. State, 421 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Sanders v. State, 400 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Hicks v. State, 388 So.2d 357 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).

OTT, C.J., and RYDER and DANAHY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. State, 424 So. 2d 207, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 18447 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

424 So. 2d 207 (Miller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hicks v. State
388 So. 2d 357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)
Sanders v. State
400 So. 2d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Hernandez v. State
421 So. 2d 1102 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)