Miller v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Miller v. State

409 So. 2d 109, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19031

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 26, 1982

DocketNo. 81-780

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 409 So. 2d 109 (Miller v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. State, 409 So. 2d 109, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19031 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The question of the admissibility in evidence of an extra-judicial confession is for the court to decide, based on all the circumstances of the confession, Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981). For purpose of a felony-murder conviction it is irrelevant that appellant was not present at the time of the actual killing. As a perpetrator of the underlying felony, she is a principal in the homicide. Goodwin v. State, 405 So.2d 170 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The question of the admissibility in evidence of an extra-judicial confession is for the court to decide, based on all the circumstances of the confession, Palmes v. State, 397 So.2d 648 (Fla.1981). For purpose of a felony-murder conviction it is irrelevant that appellant was not present at the time of the actual killing. As a perpetrator of the underlying felony, she is a principal in the homicide. Goodwin v. State, 405 So.2d 170 (Fla.1981).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 So. 2d 109, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 19031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-state-fladistctapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack