Miller v. Parish

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Christopher Miller,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 1:21cv200

Tyler Parish, et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on June 29, 2023 (Doc. 51). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties may forfeit rights on appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R (Doc. 51) have been filed and the time to do so has expired. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 51) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 48) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff’s Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 50) is DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court