Miller v. Parish
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Miller,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:21-cv-00200
Tyler Parish, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's January 20, 2022 Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). (Doc. 23). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. (Doc. 23 PageID 114); see United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). Although Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel during the period to submit objections to the January 20, 2022 R&R, that filing does not relate to the recommendation that Plaintiff's motion to be transferred back to the Ohio State Penitentiary and/or for a temporary restraining order be denied. Compare (Doc. 23 (R&R), with (Doc. 25) (Plaintiff's Motion to Compel). Accordingly, no objections to the January 20, 2022 R&R have been filed, and the time to so file has passed. It is hereby ORDERED that the January 20, 2022 R&R (Doc. 23) is ADOPTED in full, and Plaintiff's Motion to be Transferred (Doc. 20) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s Michael R. Barrett________ Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Parish (Miller v. Parish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.