Miller v. Parish
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Christopher Miller,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 1:21cv200
Tyler Parish, et al., Judge Michael R. Barrett
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by the Magistrate Judge on April 29, 2021 (Doc. 8). Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the R&R in a timely manner. United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge=s R&R (Doc. 8) have been filed. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 8) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Consistent with the recommendation by the Magistrate Judge, the Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e)(2)(B) and 1915A(b)(1), with the exception of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment excessive force claims against Defendants Tackett and Parish in their individual capacities. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Michael R. Barrett Michael R. Barrett, Judge United States District Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Miller v. Parish (Miller v. Parish) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.