Miller v. Miller

70 A.D.2d 571, 417 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11963
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller v. Miller. Read the opinion of the Court — 61 A.D.2d 774

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New Yprk County, entered March 12, 1979, modified to grant the motion for a protective order, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, without prejudice to an appropriately limited notice or motion for discovery, without costs, and otherwise affirmed. Even, as modified, by Special Term in respect of time covered and documents to be produced, the notice of examination remains so broad as to constitute a "fishing expedition”. This disposition is without prejudice to a notice pursuant to CPLR 3120 or by notice under CPLR 3111, calling for documents obviously connected with the legitimate subject matter of the examination (see 3A Weinstein-Korn-Miller, NY Civ Prac, par 3111.10). It would be appropriate if plaintiff is without such requisite knowledge of documents as to be able to describe them properly, to proceed initially by appropriate deposition to secure the necessary information, as described in Rios v Donovan (21 AD2d 409, 414). Concur — Birns, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lane and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller v. Miller, 70 A.D.2d 571, 417 N.Y.S.2d 867, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

70 A.D.2d 571 (Miller v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rios v. Donovan
21 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)