Miller v. Miller

61 A.D.2d 774, 402 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10181
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 23, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 61 A.D.2d 774 (Miller v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miller v. Miller, 61 A.D.2d 774, 402 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 29, 1977, which granted plaintiff temporary child support of $100 per week commencing June 30, 1977, plus expenses for the infant child’s education, medical bills and telephone, unanimously reversed, on the law, and on the facts, without costs and without disbursements, to the extent appealed from, by vacating the second decretal paragraph which directs defendant to pay $100 per week for temporary child support. Under sections 413 and 414 of the Family Court Act "both the father and the mother are equally responsible for the support of their children and * * * it is within the power of the * * * Court, and it is its duty, to apportion the costs of such support between them in accordance with their respective means and responsibilities, without regard to the sex of the parent” (Matter of Carter v Carter, 58 AD2d 438, 447; Tessler v Siegel, 59 AD2d 846). Since plaintiff’s income for the past several years exceeded that of defendant and her assets are much greater, it is clear that the award of child support on this record was based on the erroneous assumption that the father is primarily obligated to support the children. The older of the parties’ two children resides with defendant and he is paying all of her expenses. The younger resides with plaintiff and defendant is voluntarily paying her telephone, educational and medical bills. Under these circumstances, the mandate of a fair apportionment of child support requires vacatur of the decretal paragraph of the order which directs defendant to pay $100 per week for temporary child support. Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Lane, Sandler and Sullivan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Polite v. Polite
127 A.D.2d 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Sementilli v. Sementilli
102 A.D.2d 78 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Burton v. Burton
454 A.2d 1282 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
Gotthainer v. Gotthainer
107 Misc. 2d 221 (NYC Family Court, 1980)
Davis v. Davis
77 A.D.2d 890 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Roth v. Roth
98 Misc. 2d 618 (NYC Family Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 A.D.2d 774, 402 N.Y.S.2d 202, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-miller-nyappdiv-1978.