Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

58 Pa. Super. 464, 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330

CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 16, 1914

DocketAppeal, No. 3

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 58 Pa. Super. 464 (Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 58 Pa. Super. 464, 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330 (Pa. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This action of assumpsit was begun before a justice of the peace. The summons was served upon George A. Johnson, local agent of the defendant company, at Lock Haven, Pa., at the office and place of the company for receiving premiums. Upon the return day, as shown by the justice’s transcript, George A. Johnson appeared before the justice and requested a continuance for the defendant until a later day, which was granted. Upon this later date the defendant did not appear and after judgment had been entered in the plaintiff’s favor a certiorari was sued out. The common pleas affirmed the [465]*465judgment of the justice and thereupon this appeal was taken. A motion to quash is presented which, amongst other things, is based on the ground that the judgment of the common pleas is final. The precise question in all of its essential features was raised and considered by this court in Huntingdon and Broad Top Mountain Railroad v. Fluke, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 126. Following the principle of that decision and of other cases therein cited we are led to the conclusion that the motion must prevail. The case of Murdy v. McCutcheon et ux., 95 Pa. 435, which is urged upon our attention by the appellant’s counsel, was therein considered and we are not required to say anything further than we said there with regard to the controlling effect of that decision. Section 22 of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 161, provides that “the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final on all proceedings removed as aforesaid (by certiorari), by the said court, and no writ of error shall issue thereon.” “This prohibition, that has been on the statute books for over 100 years and has been found to. work well, ought not to be refined away by subtle and ingenious construction that is, in effect, a repudiation of it. It has been upheld and enforced in a multitude of cases. We have no authority, and, if we had, we would have no disposition, to tone down the vigor of its expression:” Home Protective Association v. Reese, 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 452.

The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This action of assumpsit was begun before a justice of the peace. The summons was served upon George A. Johnson, local agent of the defendant company, at Lock Haven, Pa., at the office and place of the company for receiving premiums. Upon the return day, as shown by the justice’s transcript, George A. Johnson appeared before the justice and requested a continuance for the defendant until a later day, which was granted. Upon this later date the defendant did not appear and after judgment had been entered in the plaintiff’s favor a certiorari was sued out. The common pleas affirmed the [465]*465judgment of the justice and thereupon this appeal was taken. A motion to quash is presented which, amongst other things, is based on the ground that the judgment of the common pleas is final. The precise question in all of its essential features was raised and considered by this court in Huntingdon and Broad Top Mountain Railroad v. Fluke, 32 Pa. Superior Ct. 126. Following the principle of that decision and of other cases therein cited we are led to the conclusion that the motion must prevail. The case of Murdy v. McCutcheon et ux., 95 Pa. 435, which is urged upon our attention by the appellant’s counsel, was therein considered and we are not required to say anything further than we said there with regard to the controlling effect of that decision. Section 22 of the Act of March 20, 1810, 5 Sm. L. 161, provides that “the judgment of the court of common pleas shall be final on all proceedings removed as aforesaid (by certiorari), by the said court, and no writ of error shall issue thereon.” “This prohibition, that has been on the statute books for over 100 years and has been found to. work well, ought not to be refined away by subtle and ingenious construction that is, in effect, a repudiation of it. It has been upheld and enforced in a multitude of cases. We have no authority, and, if we had, we would have no disposition, to tone down the vigor of its expression:” Home Protective Association v. Reese, 47 Pa. Superior Ct. 452.

The appeal is quashed at the costs of the appellant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 Pa. Super. 464, 1914 Pa. Super. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miller-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-pasuperct-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack