Miller-Davis Co v. Ahrens Construction Inc

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Miller-Davis Co v. Ahrens Construction Inc. Read the opinion of the Court — 495 Mich. 161
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 2013·No. 145052·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 5, 2013 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

145052 & (92) Michael F. Cavanagh Stephen J. Markman Mary Beth Kelly Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack MILLER-DAVIS COMPANY, David F. Viviano, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 145052 COA: 284037 Kalamazoo CC: 05-000199-CK AHRENS CONSTRUCTION, INC., Defendant-Appellee, and MERCHANTS BONDING COMPANY, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the March 22, 2012 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether the indemnification clause in the plaintiff’s contract with defendant Ahrens applies to this case; (2) if so, whether the plaintiff’s action for breach of that provision was barred by the statute of limitations, MCL 600.5807(8); and (3) whether the plaintiff adequately proved that any breach of the indemnification clause caused its damages, including the issue whether the trial court clearly erred in concluding that defendant Ahrens’ performance of nonconforming work caused the natatorium moisture problem.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 5, 2013 h0529 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miller-Davis Co v. Ahrens Construction Inc, (Mich. 2013).

Miller-Davis Co v. Ahrens Construction Inc (Miller-Davis Co v. Ahrens Construction Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.