Miles v. Bird

1914 OK 62, 138 P. 789, 41 Okla. 428, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 156
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedFebruary 10, 1914
Docket3634
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 1914 OK 62 (Miles v. Bird) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Miles v. Bird, 1914 OK 62, 138 P. 789, 41 Okla. 428, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 156 (Okla. 1914).

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This appeal by case-made was filed in this court February 27, 1912. The plaintiff in error filed brief on May 29, 1912. The defendant in error has not filed a brief, and has given no reason for not doing so.

We have examined the errors assigned in the brief for plaintiff in error, and the record upon which they are predicated, and *429 the grounds urged for reversal appear to be well taken. In such situation we are not required to search the record, or to hunt for authorities, to find some theory upon which the judgment may possibly be sustained. Butler v. McSpadden, 25 Okla. 465, 107 Pac. 170; Ellis v. Outler, 25 Okla. 469, 106 Pac. 957; Buckner v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 25 Okla. 472, 106 Pac. 959; Reeves & Co. v. Brennan, 25 Okla. 544, 106 Pac. 959; Sharpleigh Hdw. Co. v. Pritchard, 25 Okla. 808, 108 Pac. 360; Butler v. Stinson, 26 Okla. 216, 108 Pac. 1103; School Dist. v. Shelton, 26 Okla. 229, 109 Pac. 67, 138 Am. St. Rep. 962; Flanagan v. Davis, 27 Okla. 422, 112 Pac. 990; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Long, 27 Okla. 456, 112 Pac. 991; Phillips v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 99, 118 Pac. 371; Doyle v. School Dist., 30 Okla. 81, 118 Pac. 386; Bank of Grove v. Dennis, 30 Okla. 70, 118 Pac. 570; Hawkins v. White, 31 Okla. 118, 120 Pac. 561; Rudd v. Wilson, 32 Okla. 85, 121 Pac. 252; Reynolds-Davis & Co. v. Hotchkiss, 31 Okla. 606, 122 Pac. 165; First Nat. Bank v. Blair, 31 Okla. 562, 122 Pac. 527; Van Arsdale-Osborne Brokerage Co. v. Patterson, 30 Okla. 113, 120 Pac. 933.

The cause should be reversed and remanded for a nery trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Davis
1952 OK 186 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1952)
W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Clark
1926 OK 1004 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Merchants Southwest Transfer & Storage Co. v. Woodruff
1923 OK 924 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
New State Telephone Co. v. Scahill
1923 OK 837 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Congher v. Mahan
219 P. 291 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Dickson v. Taylor
1923 OK 783 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Loughbridge v. Tynes
1923 OK 366 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Graham v. Kay
1923 OK 288 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
In Re Gardner's Estate
1917 OK 426 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
Walker v. Robinson
1917 OK 427 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)
United Talking Machine Co. v. Swindle
1917 OK 417 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1914 OK 62, 138 P. 789, 41 Okla. 428, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miles-v-bird-okla-1914.