United Talking Machine Co. v. Swindle

1917 OK 417, 166 P. 1047, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 125
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 8, 1917
Docket7049
StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK 417 (United Talking Machine Co. v. Swindle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Talking Machine Co. v. Swindle, 1917 OK 417, 166 P. 1047, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 125 (Okla. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The verdict in this cause was rendered on the 15th day of May, 1914. The motion for a new trial was denied on the 6th day of August, 1914. The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on December 22, 1914. The plaintiff in error’s brief was filed on August 5, 1916.. There appears on this brief an acknowledgment of service on the 22nd day of July, 1916, by the attorney for the defendant in error. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant in error, and no excuse has been shown for the failure to do so.

We have examined the errors assigned in the 'brief for the plaintiff in error, and the record upon which they are based, and find the grounds therein urged for a reversal to be reasonably well sustained. Upon the authority of Miles v. Bird, 41 Okla 428, 138 Pac. 789, and the line of authorities therein cited, the judgment appealed from will be reversed, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miles v. Bird
1914 OK 62 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1917 OK 417, 166 P. 1047, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-talking-machine-co-v-swindle-okla-1917.