Walker v. Robinson

1917 OK 427, 166 P. 1042, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 126
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedAugust 14, 1917
Docket7048
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 1917 OK 427 (Walker v. Robinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Walker v. Robinson, 1917 OK 427, 166 P. 1042, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 126 (Okla. 1917).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The verdict of the jury was returned in this cause on the 18th day of May, 1914. The motion for new trial was denied on the 6th day of August, 1914.

The petition in error and case-made were filed in this court on December 22, 1914. The plaintiff in error prepared and served and filed his brief in this court on the 17th day of July, 1916. An indorsement on the brief shows an acknowledgment of service by the attorney for the defendant on the 8th day of July, 1916. No brief has been filed on behalf of the defendant in error, nor has any showing been made for the failure to do so.

We have examined the errors assigned in the brief of the plaintiff in error, and the record upon which they are predicated, and the grounds urged for a reversal appear to be well taken,. Under such situation, we are not required to search the record, or hunt authorities upon which the judgment may possibly be sustained. Upon authority of the case of Miles v. Bird, 41 Okla. 428, 138 Pac. 789, and the list of cases therein cited, the judgment appealed from will be reversed, in accordance with the prayer of the petition in error, and the cause remanded for a new trial.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Clark
1926 OK 1004 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
Merchants Southwest Transfer & Storage Co. v. Woodruff
1923 OK 924 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
New State Telephone Co. v. Scahill
1923 OK 837 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Congher v. Mahan
219 P. 291 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Dickson v. Taylor
1923 OK 783 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Loughbridge v. Tynes
1923 OK 366 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Graham v. Kay
1923 OK 288 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1917 OK 427, 166 P. 1042, 66 Okla. 56, 1917 Okla. LEXIS 126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/walker-v-robinson-okla-1917.