Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided July 15, 2025·No. 1:25-cv-04971·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YEHUDAH TZIYONKEISH MILCHAMOT, Petitioner, -against- 25 CIVIL 4971 (KMW) JUDGMENT NEW YORK CITY DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent. wa eK It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated July 11, 2025, the Court denies Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and repeats the warning issued in Milchamot v. Chief Bronx Dist. Attorney, No. 25-CV-1157 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2025) (Cronan, J.). Because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Dated: New York, New York July 15, 2025 TAMMI M. HELLWIG Clerkof Court

BY: ER ‘Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections, (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections (Milchamot v. New York City Dept. of Corrections) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)