Milchamot v. Bronx District Attorney's Office

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK YEHUDAH MILCHAMOT, Plaintiff, 24-CV-9101 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BRONX DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On September 28, 2016, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Mil’chamot v. Preska, ECF 1:16-CV-6134, 6 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 28, 2016). Plaintiff, acting pro se, brings this new case seeking IFP status, but he has not sought leave from the Court to file this action. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the September 28, 2016 order. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Judgment shall enter. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 2, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge