Michigan ex rel. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway
257 U.S. 609, 42 S. Ct. 46, 66 L. Ed. 395, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1350
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co., 250 U. S. 394.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Michigan ex rel. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U.S. 609, 42 S. Ct. 46, 66 L. Ed. 395, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1350 (1921).
257 U.S. 609 (Michigan ex rel. Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Treasurer v. Wilson
377 N.W.2d 703 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1985)
City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial Relations
263 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1923)
City of Trenton v. New Jersey
262 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1923)
City of Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.
258 U.S. 608 (Supreme Court, 1922)
Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.
258 U.S. 604 (Supreme Court, 1922)