City of Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.
258 U.S. 608, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 788, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2316
Opinion
Dismissed upon the
authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon, point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618; Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Ry. Co., ante, 604.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co., 258 U.S. 608, 42 S. Ct. 316, 66 L. Ed. 788, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2316 (1922).
258 U.S. 608 (City of Sapulpa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Y & Y Cab Service, Inc. v. Oklahoma City
28 P.2d 551 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)
Tonopah Sewer & Drainage Co. v. Nye County
254 P. 696 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1927)
Western Oklahoma Gas & Fuel Co. v. City of Duncan
1926 OK 945 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1926)
City of Tulsa v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co.
4 F.2d 399 (E.D. Oklahoma, 1925)
City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial Relations
263 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1923)