Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.
258 U.S. 604, 66 L. Ed. 786, 42 S. Ct. 313, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2306
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1922·No. No. 152; No. 266·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co., 258 U.S. 604, 66 L. Ed. 786, 42 S. Ct. 313, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2306 (1922).
258 U.S. 604 (Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas (United States, Intervener)
265 U.S. 500 (Supreme Court, 1924)
City of Winfield v. Court of Industrial Relations
263 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1923)
City of Trenton v. New Jersey
262 U.S. 182 (Supreme Court, 1923)