Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.
This text of 258 U.S. 604 (Borough of Edgewood v. Wilkinsburg & East Pittsburgh Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Hunter v. Pittsburgh, 207 U. S. 161, 178; Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil Co., 250 U. S. 394, 397; Kansas City v. Public Service Commission of Missouri, 250 U. S. 652; Hillsboro v. Public Service Commission of Oregon; point (3), 255 U. S. 562; Groesbeck v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 609; Chicago v. Chicago Railways Co., 257 U. S. 617; Avon v. Detroit United Railway, 257 U. S. 618.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 U.S. 604, 66 L. Ed. 786, 42 S. Ct. 313, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/borough-of-edgewood-v-wilkinsburg-east-pittsburgh-street-railway-co-scotus-1922.