MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. Secretary of State

Michigan Supreme Court

MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. Secretary of State

764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1113

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMay 8, 2009

Docket137451

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 575 (MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. Secretary of State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MICHIGAN EDUCATION ASSOCIATION v. Secretary of State, 764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1113 (Mich. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal May 8, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order addressing the following issues: (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of plaintiff Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.257(1), prohibits a school district from expending government resources for such a payroll deduction plan if the costs of the plan are prepaid by the MEA; and (3) whether a school district has the authority to collect and deliver payroll deductions for such contributions. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Orders Granting Oral Argument in Cases Pending on Application for Leave to Appeal May 8, 2009:

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order addressing the following issues: (1) whether a school district’s use of government resources for a payroll deduction plan for contributions made by members of plaintiff Michigan Education Association (MEA) to MEA’s political action committee is either an “expenditure” or a “contribution” under § 6 of the Michigan Campaign Finance Act (MCFA), MCL 169.206; (2) whether § 57(1) of the MCFA, MCL 169.257(1), prohibits a school district from expending government resources for such a payroll deduction plan if the costs of the plan are prepaid by the MEA; and (3) whether a school district has the authority to collect and deliver payroll deductions for such contributions. The parties should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/michigan-education-association-v-secretary-of-state-mich-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack