Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc.

764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1115
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 8, 2009
DocketNo.137500
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 764 N.W.2d 575 (Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc., 764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1115 (Mich. 2009).

Opinion

We direct the clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(G)(1). At oral argument, the parties shall address whether the jurisdictional standard established at MCL 418.845, as interpreted by this Court in Karaczweski v Farbman & [1002]*1002Stein Co, 478 Mich 28 (2007), should be applied in this case. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 56 days of the date of this order, but they should not submit mere restatements of their application papers.

The Workers’ Compensation Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issue presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae. Court of Appeals No. 285593.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bezeau v. Palace Sports & Entertainment, Inc
795 N.W.2d 797 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.W.2d 575, 483 Mich. 1001, 2009 Mich. LEXIS 1115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bezeau-v-palace-sports-entertainment-inc-mich-2009.