Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson

Ohio Supreme Court

Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson

1998 Ohio 547, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1212

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 7, 1998

Docket1996-1465

StatusPublished

This text of 1998 Ohio 547 (Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 1998 Ohio 547, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1212 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 1212.]

MIAMI COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. THOMPSON. [Cite as Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 1998-Ohio-547.] (No. 96-1465—Submitted and decided May 7, 1998.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, Attorney Registration No. 0020056, last known address in Beavercreek, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 2, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 103, 676 N.E.2d 879. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 1212.]

MIAMI COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION v. THOMPSON. [Cite as Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson, 1998-Ohio-547.] (No. 96-1465—Submitted and decided May 7, 1998.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, Attorney Registration No. 0020056, last known address in Beavercreek, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of April 2, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 103, 676 N.E.2d 879. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1998 Ohio 547, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1212, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/miami-cty-bar-assn-v-thompson-ohio-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack