Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Thompson
Opinion
We accept the findings and conclusions of the board, but believe that a more stringent penalty is warranted. Respondent represented the lender in this case, but his arrangement with the parties enabled him to receive a fee from the borrower for each loan made by the lender. Despite the fact that the lender independently decided to make each loan, this arrangement put respondent in a position where he could profit by withholding information from or exercising influence on the lender.
A lawyer should avoid even the appearance of impropriety and the implication that his professional judgment on behalf of a client could be affected by the [105]*105lawyer’s own interests. Respondent is therefore suspended for one year from the practice of law. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
676 N.E.2d 879 (Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.