Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Thompson

693 N.E.2d 1088, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1212
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 7, 1998·No. No. 96-1465·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, Attorney Registration No. 0020056, last known address in Beaver-creek, Ohio.

The court coming now to consider its order of April 2, 1997, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of one year, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore,

[1213]*1213IT IS ORDERED by this court that Nathan A. Thompson, a.k.a. Nathan Arnold Thompson, be and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication.

For earlier case, see Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson (1997), 78 Ohio St.3d 103, 676 N.E.2d 879.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Thompson, 693 N.E.2d 1088, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1212 (Ohio 1998).

693 N.E.2d 1088 (Miami County Bar Ass'n v. Thompson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami Cty. Bar Assn. v. Thompson
1998 Ohio 547 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1998)