Messenger v. Dennie

137 Mass. 197, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 226
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 10, 1884
StatusPublished
Cited by28 cases

This text of 137 Mass. 197 (Messenger v. Dennie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Messenger v. Dennie, 137 Mass. 197, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 226 (Mass. 1884).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

There was no evidence of due care on the part of the plaintiff. He voluntarily and thoughtlessly put himself in a position of great and obvious danger. He suddenly left the sleigh on which he was riding, while it was in motion, in a frequented thoroughfare, and within thirty feet of the defendant’s horse, without looking back or thinking of what might be following. His injury was the natural consequence of his careless act. He was engaged in the sport of riding upon the runners of sleighs in the public streets with the consent of his parents; and, if he was too young to appreciate the danger of his act, he was too young to engage in that sport, and his parents were negligent in permitting it.

For this reason, without considering whether there was any evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, the court should have ruled that the plaintiff could not recover.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. Buchanan
28 N.E.2d 421 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1940)
Willar v. Bergman
2 Mass. App. Div. 213 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1937)
Moeller v. Packard
261 P. 315 (California Court of Appeal, 1927)
Todd v. Orcutt.
183 P. 963 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)
Miller v. Flash Chemical Co.
230 Mass. 419 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1918)
Havermale v. Houck
89 A. 314 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1913)
Mills v. Powers
102 N.E. 912 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Godfrey v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
102 N.E. 652 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1913)
Schoonover v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
73 S.E. 266 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1911)
Russo v. Charles S. Brown Co.
84 N.E. 840 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1908)
Beale v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.
81 N.E. 867 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1907)
Young v. Small
73 N.E. 1019 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
McDermott v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
68 N.E. 34 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Jones v. Shattuck
56 N.E. 736 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
Chicago & G. T. Ry. Co. v. Hoffman
82 Ill. App. 453 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1899)
Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad v. Heiman
9 Ohio Cir. Dec. 222 (Stark Circuit Court, 1898)
Calumet Electric Street Railway Co. v. Van Pelt
68 Ill. App. 582 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1897)
Payne v. Chicago & Alton Railroad
38 S.W. 308 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
Mullen v. Springfield Street Railway Co.
41 N.E. 664 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Casey v. City of Malden
40 N.E. 849 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
137 Mass. 197, 1884 Mass. LEXIS 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messenger-v-dennie-mass-1884.