Messenger v. Dennie
This text of 5 N.E. 283 (Messenger v. Dennie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
When this case was before the court at a former term, it was decided that, upon the facts then appearing, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover. Messenger v. Bennie, 137 Mass. 197. The facts offered to be shown at the second trial do not in any essential particular differ from those shown at the first trial. The plaintiff was engaged in the dangerous sport of riding upon the runners of a sleigh in the public street; he suddenly left the runner of the sleigh on which he was riding, while it was in motion, in front and within a few feet of the sleigh driven by the defendant, who was driving at a moderate rate of speed. If, as is now claimed, the plaintiff saw the defendant’s team approaching, it does not help his case. He thoughtlessly and imprudently put himself in a position of danger, and, upon the facts, his injury is attributable to his own carelessness, and not to any negligence of the defendant.
Judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 N.E. 283, 141 Mass. 335, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messenger-v-dennie-mass-1886.