Messaro v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
This text of 274 A.D. 939 (Messaro v. Long Island Rail Road Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for injuries sustained in a collision between the automobile of the defendant-appellant, in which plaintiff was a passenger, and a railroad train of the defendant-respondent, the latter cross-complained for indemnity from the defendant-appellant upon the allegation that the negligence of the defendant-appellant was primarily responsible for the accident. This appeal is from the order denying appellant’s motion to dismiss the cross complaint. The order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements, and appellant’s motion to dismiss the cross complaint is granted, with $10 costs. Under the allegations of the complaint the defendant-respondent railroad company can be held liable to plaintiff only if its own active negligence is shown to be a proximate cause of plaintiff’s injuries. (Wineck v. Yanoff, 265 App. Div. 835; Rosenman v. Detz, 259 App. Div. 911; Secor v. Levine, 273 App. Div. 899; Wolf v. La Rosa & Sons, 272 App. Div. 932, affd. 298 N. Y. 597.) Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 A.D. 939, 83 N.Y.S.2d 527, 1948 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/messaro-v-long-island-rail-road-co-nyappdiv-1948.