Rosenman v. Detz

259 A.D. 911, 20 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 14, 1940·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs, passengers in defendant Detz’s automobile, which collided with the car of defendant Rossiter. Order denying the motion of defendant Detz to strike out and dismiss the cross pleading contained in the answer of defendant Rossiter reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, without costs. The cross-complaint of defendant Rossiter for indemnification from his codefendant is improperly interposed in this action where, under the allegations of the plaintiffs’ complaint, defendant Rossiter will be liable to plaintiffs only if his active negligence is established. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rosenman v. Detz, 259 A.D. 911, 20 N.Y.S.2d 158, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7249 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

259 A.D. 911 (Rosenman v. Detz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Messaro v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
274 A.D. 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)