Szarewicz v. Alboro Crane Rental Corp.

30 A.D.2d 787, 291 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3448

Opinion

Order entered October 9, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to appellant, and the motion to dismiss the third-party complaint granted. Where the defendant is alleged to be guilty only of active as distinguished from passive negligence, impleader is improper as a matter of law, since an actively negligent tort-feasor is not entitled to indemnity (see, e.g., Messaro v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 274 App. Div. 939) ”. (Putvin v. Buffalo Elec. Co., 5 N Y 2d 447, 455.) Moreover, in the absence of a specific agreement to assume responsibility for the negligence of the third-party plaintiff, the indemnity agreement “ falls far short of that unequivocal expression of an intention to indemnify” required by the precedents. (Bernardo v. Fordham Moisting Co., 6 A D 2d 619, 621.) Concur—Stevens, J. P., Eager, Capozzoli, McGivern and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Szarewicz v. Alboro Crane Rental Corp., 30 A.D.2d 787, 291 N.Y.S.2d 757, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3448 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

30 A.D.2d 787 (Szarewicz v. Alboro Crane Rental Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Messaro v. Long Island Rail Road Co.
274 A.D. 939 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)