Mertens v. Mertens
688 So. 2d 1155, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 392, 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 577887
This text of 688 So. 2d 1155 (Mertens v. Mertens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Mertens v. Mertens, 688 So. 2d 1155, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 392, 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 577887 (La. Ct. App. 1996).
Opinion
For the reasons assigned in the case of Lettie Doris Mertens v. Daniel F. Mertens, 96-391 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/09/96); 688 So.2d 1148, which was consolidated with this case, the trial court’s judgment is reversed in part, affirmed in part and rendered.
Costs of this appeal are assessed equally against Doris Mertens and Daniel Mertens.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART; AND RENDERED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Mertens v. Mertens
688 So. 2d 1148 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
688 So. 2d 1155, 96 La.App. 3 Cir. 392, 1996 La. App. LEXIS 2368, 1996 WL 577887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mertens-v-mertens-lactapp-1996.