Meeker v. Board of Commissioners

53 Ind. 31
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1876·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Downey, C. J.

The question as to the correctness of the ruling of the circuit court in dismissing an appeal from the action of the board of commissioners of the county cannot be presented without a bill of exceptions setting forth the ground on .which the circuit court acted. Conoway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263; Engard v. Frazier, 7 Ind. 154; Smith v. Smith, 15 Ind. 315; Aspinwall v. The Board of Comm’rs, etc., 18 Ind. 372; Wilson v. Truelock, 19 Ind. 389; Carr v. Thomas, 34 Ind. 292; Burntrager v. McDonald, 34 Ind. 277; Dritt v. Dodds, 35 Ind. 63; Orr v. Worden, 10 Ind. 553.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meeker v. Board of Commissioners, 53 Ind. 31 (Ind. 1876).

53 Ind. 31 (Meeker v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rush v. Foos Manufacturing Co.
51 N.E. 143 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1898)
Crumley v. Hickman
92 Ind. 388 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1884)
Yost v. Conroy
92 Ind. 464 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)