Carr v. Thomas

Indiana Supreme Court

Carr v. Thomas

34 Ind. 292

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1870

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 34 Ind. 292 (Carr v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Carr v. Thomas, 34 Ind. 292 (Ind. 1870).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was a complaint by the appellant against the appellee for an injunction. On motion of defendant below, the cause was ordered by the court below, to be stricken' from the docket, to which the'plaintiff excepted, but filed no bill of exceptions, nor does it in any way appear on what ground the order was made. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, we must presume that the order was correctly made. Conoway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263. The ground of the action of the court shoúld have been made to appear by a bill of exceptions. Engard v. Frazier, 7 Ind. 154.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

This was a complaint by the appellant against the appellee for an injunction. On motion of defendant below, the cause was ordered by the court below, to be stricken' from the docket, to which the'plaintiff excepted, but filed no bill of exceptions, nor does it in any way appear on what ground the order was made. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, we must presume that the order was correctly made. Conoway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263. The ground of the action of the court shoúld have been made to appear by a bill of exceptions. Engard v. Frazier, 7 Ind. 154.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 Ind. 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/carr-v-thomas-ind-1870.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack