Carr v. Thomas

34 Ind. 292
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1870·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was a complaint by the appellant against the appellee for an injunction. On motion of defendant below, the cause was ordered by the court below, to be stricken' from the docket, to which the'plaintiff excepted, but filed no bill of exceptions, nor does it in any way appear on what ground the order was made. In the absence of any showing to the contrary, we must presume that the order was correctly made. Conoway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263. The ground of the action of the court shoúld have been made to appear by a bill of exceptions. Engard v. Frazier, 7 Ind. 154.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Carr v. Thomas, 34 Ind. 292 (Ind. 1870).

34 Ind. 292 (Carr v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bertch v. Mund
110 N.E. 548 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1915)
Lime City Building, Loan & Savings Ass'n v. Black
35 N.E. 829 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Yost v. Conroy
92 Ind. 464 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1883)
Meeker v. Board of Commissioners
53 Ind. 31 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1876)
Ferrier v. Deutchman
51 Ind. 21 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1875)