Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners

Indiana Supreme Court

Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners

18 Ind. 372

Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1862·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellee.

The suit was dismissed by the Court, but there is no bill of exceptions showing the grounds of the dismissal. The Clerk, to be sure, states the grounds of the dismissal, but he can not thus speak for the Court. There should have been a bill of exceptions showing the cause of the dismissal, otherwise the action of the Court will be presumed to have' been correct. Conaway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

This was an action by the appellant against the appellee.

The suit was dismissed by the Court, but there is no bill of exceptions showing the grounds of the dismissal. The Clerk, to be sure, states the grounds of the dismissal, but he can not thus speak for the Court. There should have been a bill of exceptions showing the cause of the dismissal, otherwise the action of the Court will be presumed to have' been correct. Conaway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners, 18 Ind. 372 (Ind. 1862).

Pincite

18 Ind. 372 (Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related