Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners
This text of 18 Ind. 372 (Aspinwall v. Board of Commissioners) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action by the appellant against the appellee.
The suit was dismissed by the Court, but there is no bill of exceptions showing the grounds of the dismissal. The Clerk, to be sure, states the grounds of the dismissal, but he can not thus speak for the Court. There should have been a bill of exceptions showing the cause of the dismissal, otherwise the action of the Court will be presumed to have' been correct. Conaway v. Weaver, 1 Ind. 263.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Ind. 372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aspinwall-v-board-of-commissioners-ind-1862.