Means v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Means v. State

825 S.W.2d 260, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 482, 1992 WL 33974

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 27, 1992

DocketNo. 01-92-00040-CR

StatusPublished

Cited by23 cases

This text of 825 S.W.2d 260 (Means v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Means v. State, 825 S.W.2d 260, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 482, 1992 WL 33974 (Tex. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant’s motion for recusal and disqualification of the trial judge in a criminal prosecution, after the appellant was granted a mistrial. The order complained of is interlocutory. We have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders except in narrow circumstances not present here. See [261]*261Ex parte Robinson, 641 S.W.2d 552, 555 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982) (pretrial appellate review of double jeopardy claims is constitutionally compelled). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Casias v. State, 503 S.W.2d 262, 265 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.); Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying the appellant’s motion for recusal and disqualification of the trial judge in a criminal prosecution, after the appellant was granted a mistrial. The order complained of is interlocutory. We have no jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders except in narrow circumstances not present here. See [261]*261Ex parte Robinson, 641 S.W.2d 552, 555 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1982) (pretrial appellate review of double jeopardy claims is constitutionally compelled). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Casias v. State, 503 S.W.2d 262, 265 (Tex.Crim.App.1973); Petty v. State, 800 S.W.2d 582, 583 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1990, no pet.); Tex.R.App.P. 41(b)(1).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

825 S.W.2d 260, 1992 Tex. App. LEXIS 482, 1992 WL 33974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/means-v-state-texapp-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack